03.29.09

Competing Truth Claims

Posted in Discernment, The True Church tagged , , , at 9:14 pm by Jessica

What do LDS think about other religious leaders who receive direct revelations and have written scriptures?

Take, for example, the Rev. Sun Myung Moon.

image [1]

Here are the similarities I find between the life and teachings of Rev. Moon and Joseph Smith:

Vision - “Moon claims that in 1936, when he was 16, Jesus Christ appeared to him on Easter morning on a mountainside in Northwestern Korea and told him that God had chosen him for the mission of establishing the Kingdom of Heaven on Earth, a mission that Christ had only begun. Christ supposedly told Moon that he would be ‘the completer of man’s salvation by being the Second Coming of Christ.’”

Involvement With the Occult - “Moon admits communicating with familiar spirits by means of séances. [It is a well-known fact that Moon has participated in séances conducted by a spirit transmedium named Arthur Ford (a famous Philadelphian necromancer).”

Source of Authority - Moon teaches that "the Bible is not the truth itself, but a textbook teaching the truth.  Moon's 536-page spiritual manifesto, Divine Principle (1957), is considered to be their scriptures (supposedly revealed directly to Moon by Jesus Christ), along with the Bible.  Divine Principle is considered to be the 'third testament' of the Bible, and superior to the Bible.  They also believe in continuing revelation.  Moon claims to have received new revelations from God; i.e., 'I spoke with Jesus Christ in the spirit world. And I also spoke with John the Baptist. This is my authority.' [HJB] Even Divine Principle is not the complete truth. ‘The Divine Principle revealed in this book is only part of the new truth. … as time goes on, deeper parts of the truth will be continually revealed’ (Unification Theology, p. 16).

Ultimately, Moon’s interpretations and teachings are considered to be the final and absolute source of authority. Moon’s teachings warn church members that life on earth is a continuous battle between good and evil — where they are the Chosen People — and everyone outside of the ‘True Family,’ including their biological parents, may be agents of Satan. Any person harboring doubts about Moon is deemed to be allowing himself to be part of the work of Satan.”

Christianity - “God is now throwing Christianity away and is now establishing a new religion, and this new religion is the Unification Church.”

Target of Proselytizing - “All the Christians in the world are destined to be absorbed by our movement.”

Marriage Essential For Salvation - “Marriage is the most important means of establishing God’s kingdom on earth. Moon teaches that ‘God-centered families are the building blocks of a world of peace, stability, and love,’ and that only those who are married will be saved, or qualified, for the kingdom.”

Doctrines - (1) God: Rev. Moon denies the Biblical concept of the Trinity.  (2) Salvation: “Rev. Moon teaches “the ‘Law of Indemnity’ — that God’s children must pay for at least a part of their debt of sin before God will forgive them.  They believe a person earns his salvation through fasting, fund-raising, recruitment, and other such works.”  (3) Universalism: “Moonies teach that heaven is a realm of the spirit world and that hell is inconsequential because it will ‘pass away as heaven expands,’ and all mankind is redeemed.”

(All of the above quotes were copied from this site)

Insider Doctrines - “An outsider doctrine is presented to the general public or potential converts which is more palatable and likely to be accepted, while the insider doctrine, presented to members or those deep within a group — is something completely different. A classic example of this can be found in the Unification Church. It has long been a secret inner teaching within the Unification Church, passed on by word of mouth, that Jesus was an illegitimate child, conceived through Mary having sexual intercourse with Zachariah the father of John the Baptist”   (http://www.newcovpub.com/unification/examples.html)

Doing Good - The following is an excerpt from a sermon given by a member of the Unification Church found on www.unification.net.  This teaching is taken from an Exposition of the Divine Principle – Part II, Chapter 1, Section 3.4: “ I need to look at my attitude, motivation and purpose in every thought I think, every word I speak, every action I take, everything, everything, everything. In my every thought, word and deed, I need to check my attitude, motivation, and purpose. When I do things for the church, how come I get burned out? Well ask yourself, what’s your motivation? Are you doing it for God’s will, or for glory for yourself, for credit, for recognition? “Oh, I’m such a good person because I serve True Parents.” You really have to check your motivation in everything you do. If your motivation is impure, God cannot accept that offering. If you do it but you have a horrible attitude, “Oh, I’m serving God but I really don’t want to be here, ” then you had better not be there. There is no point. So we really have to purify ourselves and check ourselves moment by moment. Pray constantly to check our attitude, motivation and purpose in everything we think and feel and say and do. We are responsible for our feelings, we are responsible for our thoughts, for our actions and our words. I have to examine whether I am being unselfish and Godly, or whether I am being selfish and Satanic. To be able to distinguish clearly between good and evil in myself, I need God’s word. Father encourages us to read his words every day. Why? So that we can clearly know good from evil, and voluntarily choose the good.” (http://www.unification.net/damian/dja20021215.html)

Read the Book - Rev. Moon says, “How many times have you read the Divine Principle book? You have to constantly study and read this book every single day… If you happen to receive a spiritual revelation through reading a translated version of the Divine Principle book, it is far below the level of experience of those who are able to read the original text. In the future there will probably be thousands of different translations of the Divine Principle book. However, the original Korean language book is the root. This means that all of these various branches can be cut off someday and everyone must return to the original Divine Principle book in order to truly understand.” (http://www.tparents.org/Moon-Talks/moon-other/sm-dp.htm)

The following account suggests that the Unification Church applies the same test as Mormonism to discern the truth of the Divine Principle book:

“Not many years ago I was at the Unification Church headquarters in downtown Minneapolis meeting with a couple of members. We were discussing their sacred book Divine Principle. A young woman told me that if I read Divine Principle and prayed I would receive a burning in the bosom to show me that this great book was from God.” (Discerning Truth, Jay Howard)

Jesus said, “Many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many…For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.  Behold, I have told you before” (Matthew 24:5, 24-25).

Questions:

1)  Is this religion of God since it invites and entices to do good?  The Book of Mormon says, “That which is of God inviteth and enticeth to do good continually; wherefore, every thing which inviteth and enticeth to do good, and to love God, and to serve him, is inspired of God” (Moroni 7:15)

2)  Would the Holy Spirit reveal to someone that they should be a part of this religion?

3)  If you do not believe the Unification Church religion is of God, how do you know this?  Have you personally read and prayed about the Divine Principle to seek God’s answer on this matter?  If not, why not?

4)  If you did read the Divine Principle and you received the same revelation that you did concerning the Book of Mormon, would you join this religion?  Why or why not?

Reference:

1. Photo was taken from this site which provides an overview of the facts of this religion.

03.25.09

“Who of all these parties are right; or, are they all wrong together?”

Posted in Christianity tagged , , , , at 2:51 am by Jessica

My dad was visiting with one of our Mormon relatives who was expressing his view that all the Christian denominations are so different from one another – that was why Joseph Smith needed to restore the church of Christ on earth.  He was going on about all the differences between the denominations when my dad started sharing with him the good news of salvation by grace through faith.  Our Mormon relative paused and then said, “That’s exactly what the Methodist minister has been trying to tell me.”  He then went on to name 3 other local pastors of different denominations who had tried to share with him that salvation is by grace through faith.

When it comes to the essential doctrine of salvation, maybe all the various denominations aren’t so very different from one another after all? 

03.23.09

Reflections on My Experiences In Multicultural Christianity

Posted in Christianity tagged , , at 4:31 am by Jessica

I had an awesome church experience this morning and I just wanted to share.  I was out of town for the weekend and I ended up visiting a church that is a bit outside my cultural tradition, but not totally unfamiliar territory for me.  The church was a fairly large, very active, independent fundamental Baptist church. They support over 365 foreign missionaries and are planning to take on 5 more.  They have a Christian school, a radio station, a bus ministry, jail & prison ministry, shut-in ministry, addictions ministry, Spanish and Korean services, and many other ministries.

Although this type of church is a little bit different for me, there are things I just love about their culture.  I love their zeal, their emphasis on soul winning and foreign missions, their bus ministries that pick up children who would not otherwise have a ride to church, their special music, and their sound Bible doctrine.  The people at this church seemed especially welcoming and friendly.

The sermon today was on the return of Christ and the pastor encouraged us from the scriptures that Jesus’ return seems so close at hand – we are to be watching and working while we await His coming.  He reminded us that we cannot be saved by our works, but we are saved to work – our work is to spread the gospel.

For some reason, I was more blessed than usual by the service today.  I was brought to tears a number of times by special music or things that were shared from the pulpit.  I think there is so much blessing we miss if we limit ourselves to one cultural tradition alone.  As Evangelicals, we need to remember to major on the majors and minor on the minors and enjoy fellowship with the whole body of Christ (without compromising in major doctrines of course – I Tim. 6:3-5).

I grew up in Baptist churches, but they were not independent fundamental.  They were more similar to mainstream evangelical churches (on the conservative side).  During my junior high and high school years my dad pastored in one community where the pastors of various denominations (Methodist, Southern Baptist, Conservative Baptist, Congregational, Non-denominational, Pentacostal, Assemblies of God) would meet together for prayer each week.  They went on prayer retreats together.  The churches would get together for community singspirations and we would participate together with other churches in gospel outreaches.  Our church was supposed to be Baptist but we had people from many different denominational backgrounds in attendance.  Sure, we didn’t see eye-to-eye on everything, but we thrived during that era by our unity in the essentials.

I then went to a non-denominational Bible college where I relished the diversity of views while remaining in agreement on the essentials.  I love a good theological debate over topics like Calvinism vs. Arminianism.  I don’t agree with either system and I think the truth lies somewhere in the middle, but I always gain a deeper understanding of God and His ways when I debate with someone who holds a view contrary to mine.

I was reflecting during my car ride home today about the bond that ties us together as believers in Jesus – we can enjoy fellowship across such a wide variety of denominations because we share the same core beliefs about who God is, who we are, and how we are saved.  There are minor differences that really don’t amount to a hill of beans.  Whenever you have a group of 2 you are going to have at least 2 opposing, strong opinions on unimportant things.  The institution of marriage illustrates this point.

But unimportant differences in non-essential beliefs are entirely inappropriate right now.  We need to keep focused on the essentials and not get sidetracked.  Jesus is coming soon!

To my LDS friends:  Is religion getting in the way of your relationship with Jesus?  Come join our multicultural crowd and let’s pursue Jesus alone!

We will welcome your strong, opposing views on “minor” details… :)

03.21.09

Who Is the Head of This Last Dispensation?

Posted in Jesus Christ, Joseph Smith tagged , , , , at 12:02 am by Jessica

The current post and comments over on Mormon Coffee caught my attention.

One of the LDS commenters was saying that Joseph Smith is the head of this last dispensation.  I wanted to spotlight Aaron’s response to this commenter as I feel his comments were powerful and worth repeating:

As the chief prophet, priest, and king, Jesus is the head of the final dispensation, and it was set up that way so he got all the attention. Introducing another dispensation and putting Joseph Smith at the head of it sidelines Jesus, no matter how much one is able to integrate the phrase “Jesus Christ” into a prayer or service.

The fullness of time was 2000 years ago, not 175 years ago. As Paul said in Ephesians 1:

7 In him we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of our trespasses, according to the riches of his grace, 8 which he lavished upon us, in all wisdom and insight 9 making known to us the mystery of his will, according to his purpose, which he set forth in Christ 10 as a plan for the fullness of time, to unite all things in him, things in heaven and things on earth.

The mystery hidden for ages and ages was not waiting for Joseph Smith to be revealed. Consider how Paul spoke in Colossians 1:

24 Now I rejoice in my sufferings for your sake, and in my flesh I am filling up what is lacking in Christ’s afflictions for the sake of his body, that is, the church, 25 of which I became a minister according to the stewardship from God that was given to me for you, to make the word of God fully known, 26 the mystery hidden for ages and generations but now revealed to his saints.

It’s all about Jesus. Time centers around him. Dispensations and priesthoods culminate in him. Temples and sacrifices end with him. He is the new temple. “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.” (John 2:19) And so he did.

“That’s my Jesus.”

The curious thing about this supposed dispensation under Joseph Smith is that I fail to see ANY foretelling or foreshadowing in scripture like we see between the OT and the NT.

The OT looked ahead to the first and second comings of Jesus and included specific, detailed prophecies about His birth, life, death, and resurrection. The OT canon closed with a prophecy of the next thing on God’s prophetic calendar: John the Baptist who would prepare the way for Jesus (Mal. 4:5-6; Luke 1:13, 17).

The NT canon ended with a look ahead toward the second coming of Jesus (Rev. 22:12, 20), but no mention is made of any prophet that we should be looking for who would prepare the way for Jesus’ return.

If this supposed dispensation under Joseph Smith is essential to salvation, why wouldn’t God have told us beforehand?

Rather, we were warned by Jesus Himself that false prophets would appear in the last days and would deceive many (Matt. 24:11, 23-26).  I’m on the watch for false prophets.  Nothing indicating we were to be looking for a true prophet.

God spoke “in time past unto the fathers by the prophets…[but] in these last daysby His Son” (Heb. 1:1-2).

03.13.09

A Question of Authority

Posted in Authority, The Great Apostasy tagged , , , , at 4:14 am by Jessica

Guest Post

(The following post was written by my sister.  These are her thoughts after a conversation she had with an LDS member this past week.  If you wish to make comments, please review the new comment policy here first. Thanks!)

Basic to LDS teaching is an issue of authority. To the LDS Church, Jesus conferred authority directly to his twelve apostles, and after their death, authority was lost and thus needed to be restored. This loss of authority is foundational to all other claims of LDS legitimacy.

They [Jesus’ twelve disciples] scattered; they taught, testified, and established the Church. And they died for their beliefs, and with their deaths came the dark centuries of apostasy.

The most precious thing lost in the Apostasy was the authority held by the Twelve—the priesthood keys. For the Church to be His Church, there must be a Quorum of the Twelve who hold the keys and confer them on others.

In time came the First Vision and the restoration of the Melchizedek Priesthood by Peter, James, and John (Boyd K. Packer, “The Twelve,” Ensign, May 2008, 83–87).

Chain of authority?

When Aaron was about to die (Numbers 20:23-29), the Lord gave advance warning of this event, and Aaron and his eldest living son Eleazar were taken to a mountaintop with Moses. There Aaron’s garments were removed and put on Eleazar, and there in the mountain, Aaron died—but not before his “authority” or position was passed on to his successor.

When it comes to authority in Christ’s church, Mormons question how there can be any claim to legitimacy for Christians in the centuries after the death of the apostles. If Christ is like Aaron, and the twelve disciples were like Eleazar, then who, they might ask, would have been the successors of the apostles? Was it not possible that this chain was broken?

The missing link

It should be noted that statements by both Peter (one of the twelve) and Paul contradict the idea that authority, and especially the ability to know and hold truth, would cease after the apostles’ deaths. (See I Timothy 4:14, II Timothy 2:2 and II Peter 1:15-21.)

However, there is a much more basic and serious issue than this. The real problem with this “chain of authority” idea lies further back—not at the “link” between the apostles and any successors, but between Christ and His twelve apostles. Unlike Aaron, who died and passed on his role to his successor, Jesus rose again and lives forever. He never passed on, laid down, or gave up His own authority. Yes, He ascended to heaven and is no longer physically present on earth, but the words He spoke to His disciples just before His ascension are the complete antithesis of a “passing of the baton.” When Jesus was about to ascend into the clouds from the Mount of Olives, He said this to His disciples:

All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. (Matthew 28:18-20)

All power

The Greek word translated “power” in the KJV (“All power is given unto me”) is exousia, often translated “authority” and almost always used in contexts where “authority” rather than sheer, brute force is the clear meaning. (For examples, see Matthew 7:29, 8:9, 9:6, and 21:23.) In this moment before Christ’s departure to heaven, He did the exact opposite of conferring his authority upon others. Rather, he claimed to have all authority in heaven and in earth. This is a far cry from a transfer of authority to the apostles.

I am with you always

Further, Jesus explicitly stated how this authority was to be carried out in His absence: “and lo, I am with you alway.” There was no need to transfer authority, for He would be always with those who believed on Him. This assurance is similar to a promise He had made earlier:

For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them. (Matthew 18:20)

Importantly, this promise for even “two or three” was made when Jesus was discussing the “church” (18:17). While the LDS church claims that after the death of the apostles there was a complete apostasy (i.e., no one with authority), Jesus prophesied the opposite. In promising that he would be “in the midst of” even “two or three…gathered together in my name,” Jesus described the nature of His church after His ascension—that He would be present with His true followers, no matter how few in numbers.

Even to the end of the world

Of even more pertinence to this issue is the time limit Jesus gave to His promise: “and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the world.” The phrase translated “end of the world” (sometimes translated “end of the age”) is used several times throughout the book of Matthew, and each time it clearly refers to the final end of the world, at the time of Christ’s return (see 13:39-43, 13:49, and 24:3). Thus, Jesus promised to personally bear authority over His own people, through His personal (though not bodily) presence, until the very end of the world. This applies as much to the era termed the “apostasy” as it does to today, since both are prior to “the end of the world.”

How do these claims of Christ leave any room for a lost authority that needed to be restored? The LDS church has sought to appeal to a supposed vanished authority of the twelve disciples, but they have not appealed high enough. They have not appealed to the authority that has never been given up—the authority of the risen, ever-living, ever-reigning, ever-present Lord Jesus Christ, who is the King of kings and Lord of lords.

New Comment Policy

Posted in The Blog at 4:10 am by Jessica

I’ve added a new link under the “Author” category in the links section to the right.  If you wish to make comments on this blog, please review this comment policy for my definition of respectful conversations.

Thanks!  :)

03.01.09

A Doctrine That Exalts Man

Posted in Joseph Smith, Nature of Man tagged , , , , at 12:59 am by Jessica

Joseph Smith made some rather bold claims regarding his superior knowledge of the Bible and the original languages.  However, despite what he often claimed, he did not always use the Bible to back up his teachings.  In my last post I pointed out some of his teachings regarding the nature of God.  He claimed he would prove his views from the Bible, but then he never did.  I would now like to look at some of his teachings on the nature of man.

Joseph Smith stated:

I have another subject to dwell upon, which is calculated to exalt man… It is associated with the subject of the resurrection of the dead,–namely, the soul–the mind of man–the immortal spirit.  Where did it come from? All learned men and doctors of divinity say that God created it in the beginning; but it is not so: the very idea lessens man in my estimation. I do not believe the doctrine; I know better…

We say that God himself is a self-existent being. Who told you so? It is correct enough; but how did it get into you [sic] heads? Who told you that man did not exist in like manner upon the same principles? Man does exist upon the same principles. God made a tabernacle and put a spirit into it, and it became a living soul…  How does it read in the Hebrew? It does not say in the Hebrew that God created the spirit of man. It says “God made man out of the earth and put into him Adam’s spirit, and so became a living body (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p. 351-354)”

First of all, I cannot figure out how Joseph Smith came up with this supposed translation of the Hebrew.  Here is the verse I believe he was attempting to quote:

“And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul” (Gen. 2:7)

The text does not say God put into Adam a spirit that was already in existence.  It says God breathed into him the breath of life and man became a living soul.  It’s one thing if Joseph Smith wanted to make the claim that he was given new revelation on this even though it could not be proven by scripture, but that’s not what he said.  Instead, he claimed that he was teaching the word of God and expounding upon the meaning in Hebrew, but he misquoted scripture and made it say something it does not actually say.

Secondly, I do not believe Joseph Smith ever read Zech. 12:1.  If he had, he might not have been so bold in stating that the Bible does not teach the creation of the spirit.

“The burden of the word of the Lord for Israel, saith the Lord, which stretcheth forth the heavens, and layeth the foundations of the earth, and formeth the spirit of man within him” (Zech. 12:1)

The same Hebrew word for formeth (yatsar) is used in Gen. 2:7 where it says God formed man.  God formed our spirits in the same way that he formed our bodies.

Joseph Smith went on to say:

But if I am right, I might with boldness proclaim from the house-tops that God never had the power to create the spirit of man at all. God himself could not create himself…(Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, pp. 354)

If I am right? These are the words of a prophet of God?  Such uncertain language does not remind me of the prophets of old who proclaimed without equivocation: “Thus saith the Lord.” The content of Smith’s teaching is also very unlike that of the OT prophets who sought to exalt God, not man.  You would never find the OT prophets saying “God never had the power” to do something.

The words of the prophet Isaiah still speak to those who would question whether God had the power to create their spirits:

“Wherefore the Lord said…Shall the work say of him that made it, He made me not? or shall the thing framed say of him that framed it, He had no understanding?”     Isaiah 29:16

“Thus saith the Lord…Woe unto him that striveth with his Maker! …Shall the clay say to him that fashioneth it, What makest thou? or thy work, He hath no hands?”     Isaiah 45:9